缺乏成本透明度与评估机制
问题概述
用户希望在分享AI设置时能够看到大致的月度费用、对不同设置的受欢迎程度进行排名，同时担心通过MCP共享时的安全性和工作流程暴露风险。
痛点标签
- 缺少月度成本信息
- 缺乏对设置的排名或流行度评估
- 担忧共享设置时的安全性与工作流程暴露
待验证问题
- 您是否愿意提供当前AI Setup的月度费用估算？
- 您是否在意是否能看到其他用户的设置排名或流行度？
- 您是否担心在分享设置时涉及的安全性或工作流程暴露？
证据
原话 · @Anonymous
This feels self-selective to how some people work, because it requires using MCP to contribute.I'm a reasonably heavy AI user, and have some custom skills/MCP servers I'd share, but there is no way in hell I'm connecting to some arbitrary MCP server and connecting my Github account to it. Nopppppeeeee.
原话 · @Anonymous
It'd be useful to see "approx monthly cost" or something similar. I love seeing other people's setups, but the first post I clicked on describes at least $400/mo in subscription plans.
原话 · @Anonymous
quite interesting but i don't see a proper ranking of whose setups are better reviewed or popular?
免责声明：本卡片由 AI 从社区讨论中提炼，属于「痛点证据」，是需求分析与验证的起点，不等同于「已验证的市场需求」。AI 存在分析局限，关键决策前请打开上方原始讨论人工复核。