Whiteboard: 可视化协作式架构设计工具
问题概述
Developers face cognitive debt and lack effective ways to review and iterate on AI‑generated code, especially when it comes to linking diagrams with code and providing a visual back‑and‑forth workflow beyond simple plan‑mode rejections.
痛点标签
- 缺乏直接编辑文件的能力，用户质疑其是否真的是 IDE
- 对图表的准确性存疑，担心 LLM 生成的图表出现错误
- 需要更好的可视化架构审查工具以替代现有的 Plan Mode
待验证问题
- 是否计划在未来支持直接编辑文件？
- 图表的准确性如何保证？
- 与现有 LSP 的集成计划是什么？
证据
原话 · @Anonymous · 来源 #comment1
You cannot currently edit files in Whiteboard. If this is something that you find yourself wanting to do, please file an issue!
原话 · @Anonymous · 来源 #comment2
One concern about accuracy of the diagrams. In the example, there is a transition back to the session service labelled "wait for release" after the "no" decision. I'm not seeing that in the shown diff.
原话 · @Anonymous · 来源 #comment3
we need a better alternative to the current Plan Mode offered by coding agents to efficiently architect software at a high level, which is more visual and offers better back-and-forth incrementation with the agent than simply "reject final plan with X message".
免责声明：本卡片由 AI 从社区讨论中提炼，属于「痛点证据」，是需求分析与验证的起点，不等同于「已验证的市场需求」。AI 存在分析局限，关键决策前请打开上方原始讨论人工复核。