Type-safe generic containers in C
问题概述
开发者在 C 语言中缺乏内置的泛型机制，需要通过宏或其他技巧实现类型安全的通用数据结构，导致代码可读性差、维护成本高，且难以获得编译器检查。
痛点标签
- 缺乏编译器原生的泛型支持
- 依赖宏实现泛型导致代码可读性低
- 希望在不引入新语言的情况下获得更高级的类型系统特性
待验证问题
- 是否愿意在现有项目中尝试使用类型安全的宏实现？
- 您是否曾经为特定数据结构编写过类型安全的宏？
- 您更倾向于使用 C++ 标准库还是继续使用 C 宏？
证据
原话 · @Anonymous
I don't understand people reinventing macro-based hacks in C to achieve what was achieved in other languages many years ago. Why not using C++, for example? It's available almost everywhere, introducing its usage in an existing C codebase is pretty simple. Sure, C++ has its own downsides, but is it better to create mess with macros in C rather then using exiting language facilities and standard library containers provided by C++?
原话 · @Anonymous
Related. Others?I write type-safe generic data structures in C - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44425461 - June 2025 (182 comments)Type-safe generic data structures in C - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26735655 - April 2021 (52 comments)
免责声明：本卡片由 AI 从社区讨论中提炼，属于「痛点证据」，是需求分析与验证的起点，不等同于「已验证的市场需求」。AI 存在分析局限，关键决策前请打开上方原始讨论人工复核。